ISO/TR. First edition. Safety of machinery — Risk assessment —. Part 2: Practical guidance and examples of methods. Sécurité des. TECHNICAL. REPORT. ISO/TR. Second edition. Reference number. ISO/TR (E). Provläsningsexemplar / Preview. Technical Report ISO/TR Ed. Written on 11 February Posted in Documents. ISO/TR Safety of machinery.
|Published (Last):||6 November 2016|
|PDF File Size:||3.11 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.55 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
ISO/TR 14121-2:2012 ED2
Everything that has been done from version 2 to 4. December 2 articles November 1 article September 2 articles August 3 articles July 2 articles June 2 articles May 5 articles April 4 articles March 9 articles January 6 articles.
December 8 articles November 5 articles October 4 articles September 2 articles August 3 articles July 6 articles June 1 article May 3 articles April 4 articles 1121-2 14 articles February 10 articles January 9 articles.
Running to around 21 pages, the example includes diagrams, tables and circuit diagrams. This Clause is effectively a detailed explanation of the risk assessment process shown in Figure 1 of ISOexcept for a few steps – such as determination of the limits of the machinery, and hazard identification – where readers are referred back to ISO Clause 5 – Risk assessment process This Clause is effectively a detailed explanation of the risk assessment process shown in Figure 1 of ISOexcept for a few steps – such as determination of the limits of the ieo, and hazard identification – where readers are referred back to ISO Readers will also appreciate the two very useful Annexes: However, in contrast to the standard it replaced, namely ISO December 7 articles November 2 articles September 3 articles August 2 articles July 7 articles June 1 article May 12 articles April 10 articles March 14 articles February 10 articles.
ISO/TR 14121-2 for machinery risk assessments – a review
For a reader who is trying to decide which risk assessment method to use, a good starting point might be to read all the discussion sub-clauses before studying the detail of the examples. All the Communications of the harmonized standards published since This last example is a hybrid method of numerical scoring and a risk matrix.
Most of the examples conclude with iwo discussion of the method and its suitability for different types of machinery. December 7 articles November 2 articles October 10 articles September 5 articles August 4 articles July 9 articles June 7 articles May 9 articles April 2 articles March 7 articles February 3 articles January 5 articles.
Annex A – Examples of methods for several steps of the risk assessment process Six examples are provided as follows: This Annex considers the risk assessment and risk reduction process for a single-spindle vertical moulding machine. Annex A gives examples of methods for several steps of the risk assessment process; and Annex B contains an example application of the process ios risk assessment and reduction.
Hazard identification by application of forms Risk matrices Risk graphs Numerical scoring Quantified risk estimation Hybrids This last example is a hybrid method of numerical scoring and a risk matrix.
Annex B – Example application of the process of risk assessment and reduction This Annex considers the risk assessment and risk reduction process for a single-spindle vertical moulding machine.
In addition, hybrid tools can make use of a combination of the above methods. In all six examples, considerable detail is provided, including graphs and tables where appropriate. What we did from to April Principleswas published in September it was generally well received. Risk matrix Risk graph Numerical scroring Quantified risk estimation In addition, hybrid tools can make use of a combination of the above methods. The evolution of CEM4 December 1 article November 1 article October 1 article September 2 articles August 1 article July 3 articles May 1 article April 1 article March 2 articles February 1 article.
Clause 7 – Risk assessment iteration This clause highlights the need to repeat all stages of 11421-2 risk assessment after the protective measures have been incorporated. Clause 7 covers Risk assessment iteration and Clause 8 covers documentation. December 1 article September 1 article July 2 articles June 1 article February 1 article.
It also notes the benefits of using a team for the risk assessment, and discusses the composition of the team and the role of the team members. Written on 11 February Jon Severn, the editor of MachineBuilding. It therefore contains numerous cross-references to Part 1; for example, readers are referred to Part 1 for all terms and definitions bar one. Harmonized 1421-2 View online. December 2 articles November 4 articles October 6 articles September 4 articles August 2 articles July 3 articles May 6 articles April 6 articles March 1 article February 8 articles January 11 articles.
This clause states that the objective, scope and deadlines for the risk assessment should be defined at the outset. This clause highlights the need to repeat all stages of the risk assessment after the protective measures have been incorporated. Although it is described as ‘non-exhaustive’ it nevertheless contains considerable detail.
ISO/TR for Machinery Risk Assessments – A Review
However, given the iterative nature of the risk assessment process, a failure to include risk reduction might have been viewed as an omission. Given the iao of this Technical Report, readers may be pleasantly surprised to learn that it includes risk reduction as well as risk assessment. Detailed discussions of each tool are provided.