Designation: D – AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS Barr Harbor Dr., West Conshohocken, PA Reprinted from the. Buy ASTM D TEST METHOD FOR BEARING CAPACITY OF SOIL FOR STATIC LOAD AND SPREAD FOOTINGS from SAI Global. ASTM: D AASHTO: T Apparatus. Loading platform of sufficient size and strength to supply the estimated load. Hydraulic or mechanical.
|Published (Last):||23 March 2008|
|PDF File Size:||4.9 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.65 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Proctor penetrometer | Matest
In local practice for structural design of mat foundations, structural engineers prefer to model the soil mass as a series of elastic springs, known as the Winkler foundation. However, once the foundation settles, 1d194-94 contact pressure redistributes. These shear strength parameters along with a unit weight of This may be because the gravelly cobble deposit is much stiffer than clayey and sandy soils.
A note on the modulus of subgrade reaction for raft foundation design. Close-up of gravelly cobble deposits. Thus, atm are generally too conservative for the design of mat foundations.
The geologic formation of the gravelly cobble deposit makes it very difficult to obtain large undisturbed samples for laboratory testing. Figure 10 shows a plot of the measured ultimate bearing capacity versus the size of the plate used in the load test. It depends on several factors, such as the length and width of the foundation, the depth of embedment of the foundation, the type of structure, and the type of asgm beneath the foundation.
Thus, it was concluded that the total pull-out resistance of asrm eight reaction anchors would be 14 kN tmuch greater than the required total allowable load of kN t. The third layer, from 2 to 2. Introductory soil mechanics and foundations, The McMillan Co. Note that the particle-size distribution of this sand matrix alone, shown separately in Fig. The second layer, from 0. Figures 5 and 6 show schematic diagrams of the setup of the plate-load test, Fig.
Plate-load tests were the focus of the experimental program. The angle of internal friction may be back-calculated from the measured ultimate d1194-9 capacity. However, such simplification is generally needed for a practical structural design of mat foundations and represents the current state of practice in Taiwan. Study of field direct shear tests in terrace deposits and Toukoshan conglomerate formation.
The test site is located in the City of Taichung, Taiwan, which is in the Taichung Basin, a concave Neotectonic basin located in midwest Taiwan. As shown in Table axtm, the values back-calculated with Terzaghi’s formula are lowest.
This gave a total allowable load of kN t.
Large Scale Plate Load Tests
Principles of foundation engineering. Design of reaction anchors The first step in the design of reaction anchors was to estimate the ultimate bearing capacity of the plate. Various aspects of the plate-load test, including design of reaction anchors and reaction beams, test setup, and test procedure, are described below. In the first stage, where the load is less than kN tthe load is measured by a load gauge which has a maximum capacity of only kN t but is more accurate.
This paper presents the result of plate-load tests conducted on a gravelly cobble deposit in Taichung Basin, Taiwan. Sand- and siltsize particles fill the space not occupied by the gravel and cobbles. Beneath the alluvial fan gravel and cobble deposits is the Late Pleistocene conglomerate formation, which extends as deep as m.
The unified soil classification of the gravelly cobble deposit is GP. The main reaction beam, measured at 13 m by 1. Each part of the mat is constructed separately. The secondary reaction beam, measured at 9 m by 1. The results of the plate-load tests on this soil deposit are analyzed and discussed. Prototype load-bearing tests for foundations and pavements. The results of these plate-load tests are presented in this paper.
In this regard, it is an important issue to select an appropriate equivalent KS zstm in the structural design of mat foundations. It can also be time dependent, since much of the settlement of mats on deep compressible soils is due to consolidation.
Their support is greatly appreciated. Evaluation of coefficients of subgrade reaction. The values back-calculated with Terzaghi’s formula are the lowest.